NYT article today in "Books" section about how poets aren't "great" anymore. Don't waste your eyesight reading the familiar whines about poetry going to hell in a handbasket and that there are JUST TOO MANY POETS because of writing programs. The NYT simply isn't looking hard enough for great poets -- perhaps not west of the Hudson. The author is way, way off if he's honestly still thinking that great poets have to be dashing, cosmopolitan, and deeply troubled, with Anglo pedigrees.
Today's great poet:
- Is a good friend to other writers, famous or not.
- Doesn't kill himself/herself if NYC publishers or lion litmags aren't into his/her innovations.
- Keeps learning and eagerly shares what he/she knows.
- Acts locally.
- Consciously contributes to the greater good.
- Keeps writing while being chided for being one of JUST TOO MANY POETS.
- Studies in a writing program if he/she wants to, and doesn't worry whether there are JUST TOO MANY WRITING PROGRAMS.